Subject	Thank you!
Posted by	s3trios on May 06, 2010 at 2:45 PM
	This message has been viewed 514 times.
In Reply To	In my opinion yes. I saw no issues with quality and I am posted by kkrofft (OH) on May 06, 2010 at 01:31 PM
Message	Good work!
Follow Ups	Additional IC testing. - kkrofft (OH) 13:06:34 05/06/10 In your opinion - s3trios 13:16:33 05/06/10 In my opinion yes. I saw no issues with quality and I am - kkrofft (OH) 13:31:12 05/06/10 Thank you! - s3trios 14:45:51 05/06/10 Nice work! (n/m) - BigTDogg (MA) 13:22:16 05/06/10 Thank you. (n/m) - kkrofft (OH) 13:32:05 05/06/10 Thanks for the info. - Wright (Ca) 13:45:58 05/06/10 I used the IO Tech Personal DAQ/56. I assume it stands - kkrofft (OH) 14:21:40 05/06/10 Oh, I see. - Wright (Ca) 14:37:47 05/06/10 Great work! - CaliguyPurdue (Selin Design) 15:07:36 05/06/10 Samples are at one second intervals. I should have labeled - kkrofft (OH) 22:08:07 05/06/10 well done (n/m) - aliaZ 15:32:01 05/06/10 Thanks, Have you thought of doing some thermal - not4resaleZ 16:55:12 05/06/10 I would like to see a thermal image too but I don't have the - kkrofft (OH) 21:55:14 05/06/10 mass flow rate is boost dependent, cfm is not - aliaZ 22:12:38 05/06/10 The flow before the turbo would be much greater, but - not4resaleZ 22:13:00 05/06/10 Yep. I had to think that through but I see it. I have not - kkrofft (OH) 07:31:12 05/07/10 I ran thru a bunch of numbers using Bell Intercooler's flow - not4resaleZ 09:45:16 05/07/10 Yup. That cooler denser air is a real good thing. (n/m) - kkrofft (OH) 10:14:41 05/07/10
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.